Lifting of the corporate veil means disregarding the corporate personality and looking behind the real person who are in the control of the company. In the doctrine of ‘Lifting the Corporate Veil’, the law goes behind the mask or veil of incorporation to determine the real person or group of people behind the company. Some texts attempt to explain veil lifting by categories: where the company is an agent of another, where there is fraud, or tax issues, or employment issues or a group of com-panies exists the courts will lift the veil. The courts, in general, consider themselves bound by this principle. The corporate veil separates the company from its shareholders. endobj The aim of this work is to examine situations when the court will lift the veil of corporation. <> This will mostly be when people have tried to use the incorporation to evade a legal obligation or liability. It states: ‘a company means a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company as defined in section 3 (1) (ii).’ The company must be registered under the Companies Act for it to become an incorp… Lifting the Veil of Incorporation. <> This principle may be referred to as the ‘Veil of incorporation’. Lifting of Corporate Veil: A company is an artificial person is clothed with a corporate veil. I'm also going to talk about the consequence of the veil being lifted, in other words, what remedies the court will give. Lifting the Corporate Veil Introduction The extremely famous and somewhat revolutionary decision of Salomon v Salmon & Co Ltd [1897 introduced andupheld the corporate personality doctrine which was then defined in the Companies Act 1862. ���_��k�'�A�� �)|�� ��T��u�. Circumstances in which courts may lift the corporate veil e veil of incorporation is thus said to be lifted. Incorporation by registration was introduced in 1844 and the doctrine of limited liability followed in 1855. The process of looking behind the veil of incorporation is what is known as lifting the veil. 841 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7033EA5303886044BBBE34826DBF6F64><4F721A8EFE6A6A439AFDCA637FF33F4C>]/Index[826 40]/Info 825 0 R/Length 80/Prev 156369/Root 827 0 R/Size 866/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream Introduction Salomon v Salomon [1] involved the principle of separate corporate personality. A high profile example can be seen in the case of the Vodafone A high profile example can be seen in the case of the Vodafone %���� The courts in general consider themselves bound by this principle. The incorporation of a company creates a separate “person” in law. This is, if anything, Corporate personality and piercing (or lifting) the veil of incorporation tends to be a popular topic for exam questions, and can also connect with most other topics in com-pany law. However, there are still circumstances in which the courts will allow a request to lift the veil. veil of incorporation as it was specifically expressed in the so called Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd decision. Critically evaluate, with reference to relevant case law and statute, how far this statement accurately reflects the current law relating to lifting the veil of incorporation. �t#�I������ Z���m�Ѯ���IF~�߇� @���b�E��A{^{lx�Y�VM_ �.���xZ�ў��m�s�ý�=ن= ��\.M�� n�~����_���C� �fX᫆�����/ v2��t�m��9 �@ %PDF-1.5 There has been a great deal of discussion as to the correct word to use in order to describe the process of bypassing the Salomon doctrine; see, for example, S. Ottolenghi, “From Peeping behind the Corporate Veil to Ignoring it Completely” (1990) 53 M.L.R. Tax-based Veil Piercing It is common practice to incorporate in jurisdictions where tax is lower or to create holding entities that may be exempt from taxation. The concept of ‘lifting the corporate veil’ has been regarded by the courts and jurists. Corporate personality is one such identified legal fiction whereby a separate identity apart from its individual members are give… In a number of circumstances, the court will pierce the corporate veil or will ignore the corporate veil to reach the person behind the veil or reveal the true form and character of the concerned company. In other words, the company alone is liable for all the acts done and the debts incurred by it and not the directors or the shareholders who are in fact the beneficial owners of the company. In the case law, Salomon v. Salomon 1897, (EXPLAIN) Lifting the Veil of Incorporation Most of the time, the courts do not go against the veil of corporation. The House of Lords decision in Salomon dominated in this period thereby acting as a restraint on veil lifting. %PDF-1.5 %���� Consequently, a company’s liabilities are its own, not those of its shareholders. through the Directors. Critically evaluate, with reference to relevant case law and statute, how far this statement accurately reflects the current law relating to lifting the veil of incorporation. Consequently, a company’s liabilities are its own, not those of its shareholders. – The paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the corporate veil. x��{[�������Pd=���xZ�|޹�k�'iI���\J����t2�|� v����o������'���O�'�qvvvyyy}}=��>>>�'M� @'''Z҉�߿��z[6x�4�ZA� ���>�C-�$�F̍�K���d2�� @۸��`�v The company, in the contemplation of law, is a person distinct from the shareholders. The Courts according to That is, the company has a corporate personality which is distinct from its members. Section 1.0 is the introductory part; section 2.0 examines the concept of lifting the veil. Abuse of the Separate Legal Personality Separate Legal Personality. The Supreme Court stated that this was a fit case for lifting of the corporate veil and the veil must be lifted when the device of incorporation is being used for some illegal or improper purpose. <> The corporate veil separates the company from its shareholders. Lifting or Piercing the Corporate Veil. In those cases there was an issue of transferring contractual obligations the same way. LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL Meaning of the doctrine: Lifting the corporate refers to the possibility of looking behind the company’s framework (or behind the company’s separate personality) to make the members liable, as an exception to the rule that they are normally shielded by the corporate shell (i.e. Thus it became necessary for the Courts to break through or lift the corporate veil and look at the persons behind the company who are the real beneficiaries of the corporate fiction.Lifting of the corporate veil means disregarding ��$� R�{O���S����1Ge������j�1�^�}q,�ܽ��cʇ��Ǧ���v�t�ݵ@�:O'��h&u�F�i�$l�n��p����(�IC�QD��ߤÌ�k8lc �f`�`�h�AX40�Y�rd�x��]�83�4/�ƒQ����&�@��(����L"�[T>d80L����! Lifting the veil of incorporation: Details: The law recognizes that a company is a separate legal entity distinct from its shareholders. where the courts are prepared to lift the „mask‟ or „veil‟ of incorporation and look at what has really been going on behind the scenes in the company. In turn, a protective “veil” of sorts is cast over the true controllers of the company. The veil of incorporation limits the personal liability of corporate directors, officers and employees for actions taken by the business. That is, at times law may have to identify certain facts as something which may go against the actual manifestation. Before dealing with the lifting of corporate veil it is pertinent to define what the meaning of a company is. The Supreme Court stated that this was a fit case for lifting of the corporate veil and the veil must be lifted when the device of incorporation is being used for some illegal or improper purpose. Legal fiction or fictio juris is a device by which law deliberately departs from the truth of things whether there is any sufficient reason for the same or not. Lifting of Corporate Veil (Piercing the Corporate Veil) By a fiction of law, a company is seen as a distinct entity separated from its members, but in reality, it is an association of persons who in fact the beneficial owners of the company and its corporate property. 3 0 obj Lifting of Corporate Veil (Piercing the Corporate Veil) By a fiction of law, a company is seen as a distinct entity separated from its members, but in reality, it is an association of persons who in fact the beneficial owners of the company and its corporate property. The doctrine which sanctions the piercing of the veil of incorporation undoubtedly represents one of the most prominent contributions which the common law has made to UK company law. However, there are still circumstances in which the courts will allow a request to lift the veil. The ‘Classical Veil Lifting’ (1897-1966) saw courts falling back heavily upon the Salomon ratio. Doctrine of “lifting the veil” received further development in the case Antonio Gramsci v Stepanovs (2011) (Nyombi 2014). Abuse of the Separate Legal Personality Separate Legal Personality. Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: The separate legal of a corporate entity personally is viewed as a veil of incorporation, which prevents outsiders taking legal action against company members, even though the outsiders can ascertain the identities of those members and the number of shares that they hold. It was called the era of early experimentation from 1897 to 1966, in which the courts experimented with various approaches to … LIFTING, PIERCING AND SIDESTEPPING THE CORPORATE VEIL James Wibberley, Guildhall Chambers & Michelle Di Gioia, Gardner Leader 1. (iii) Veil of Incorporation Veil of incorporation or corporate veil is the legal assumption that the acts of a corporation are not the actions of its shareholders, directors and managers, so that they are exempt from liability for the corporation’s actions.12 (iv) Lifting or Piercing the Corporate Veil The Courts according to It cannot act on its own, it can act only through natural persons i.e. Lifting the veil of incorporation or piercing the corporate veil means the judicial act of imposing personal liability or otherwise immuned corporate officers, d irectors or shareholders Lifting the veil of incorporation is rare in the UK. The veil shall be lifted to prevent the avoidance of recognition by the eyes of equity. The aim of the paper is to explore recent case law in order to determine whether courts have moved away from an overly restrictive approach when dealing with cases relating to the corporate personality. It constitutes the bedrock principle upon which company is regarded as … 338. 1 The doctrine has evolved incrementally on a casuistic basis as a means of avoiding injustices generated as a result of the uncompromising decision of %%EOF be maintained. In other words, unlike a partnership, the liability of members of the company is limited to the extent of capital contributed by t… The veil of incorporation is the cornerstone of the corporate law in Common law countries so it is undoubtedly an issue of significant importance in order to proceed with the analysis of the “lifting” of corporate veil in 1 0 obj endobj Lifting of the corporate veil. The corporate veil can be lifted as it is not permanent – From the juristic point of view, a company is a legal person distinct from its members as was seen in [Salomon v. Salomon and Co. Ltd. (1897). stream Lifting the veil of incorporation is rare in the UK. Shanthini ,2MS. It cannot act on its own, it can act only through natural persons i.e. Lifting the Veil of Incorporation. 865 0 obj <>stream h�bbd``b`�m@�� H�_�� � "H�Ԃ�� �9�� ��XG@����u/&F� ��G����@� �� ? 2 0 obj Introduction Salomon v Salomon [1] involved the principle of separate corporate personality. There is a dearth of overarching guiding principles for a body of largely incoherent case law.' Circumstances in which courts may lift the corporate veil DOCTRINE OF LIFTING OF CORPORATE VEIL PERSPECTIVE IN TAXATION CASES By Nikhil Singal and Aditya Bhattacharya “The company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the Memorandum and, although it may be that after incorporation the business is precisely the same as it … The spirit of Tax-based Veil Piercing is to reduce instances of tax-avoidance that are facilitated by incorporation. This is because; a company, once duly incorporated becomes an artificial person that has a separate legal entity, distinct from the people who constitute the company. They will just treat the members and the company as a separate legal entity. 2. That particular issue has been brought into focus recently by the Court of Appeal’s decision on 20 June 2012 in VTB Capital v … Corporate personality and the veil of incorporation 2 *� 7O&�| ����`�YX�� L � ��H � ��a� endstream endobj 827 0 obj <>/Metadata 78 0 R/PageLayout/OneColumn/Pages 820 0 R/StructTreeRoot 368 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 828 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> endobj 829 0 obj <>stream In other words, where a fraudulent and dishonest use is made of the legal entity, the individuals concerned will not be allowed to … This will mostly be when people have tried to use the incorporation to evade a legal obligation or liability. History of Veil of Incorporation The veil of incorporation concept was adopted back in 1897. h��Xmo�6�+��a�������Z��$]���9B"̱[���;��iY��P4O��xG�;�JN(�Rɠ���"�i�5�JBm�rjK��P;b�+J��v�9N��H� |YΝ�J��**HU U�]Y�,Ey�hg`���P��j��.͉a�h�Z����\y��Z�Z��`}��Ey�E�Gy~ ������*�狻jQ~ ��4|���ޖ�D�����U5iFR��i��E There are two situations when the court will lift the veil of incorporation. However, business owners can still be liable for business activities if they failed to follow corporate guidelines, commingled assets or acted recklessly. The act of so doing is what is known as lifting the veil. The incorporation of a company creates a separate “person” in law. Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil has been pursued since then, but the way the Doctrine of Corporate Veil is implemented has taken various approaches over the years. The lifting of corporate veil doctrine remains one of the most difficult areas of Hong Kong company law. detailed analysis of veil-piercing cases and policy. ‘Lifting of corporate veil’ or disregarding of the corporate personality is common buzz in the modern corporate arena. While it is possible to fi nd examples of veil Limited liability companies provide huge commercial benefits for businessmen, but even larger ... can hide behind the veil of incorporation when a business deal goes south. The veil of corporate personality, even though not lifted sometimes, is becoming more and more a transparent form of ensuring smooth business practices in modern jurisprudence. Strictly, a company has no particular definition but section 3(1) (i) of the Companies Act attempts to provide the meaning of the word in context of the provisions and for the use of this act. THE CONCEPT OF LIFTING THE VEIL Under the English doctrine there are a number of exceptions to the separate legal personality principle; i.e. For example, in the case of Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others v Prest. The aim of the paper is to explore recent case law in order to determine whether courts have moved away from an overly restrictive approach when dealing with cases relating to the corporate personality. This principle may be referred to as the ‘Veil of incorporation’. VH�o��f�4iލլ!Ε�O5(�M=����l6�7��Av�"���Mi�a�a�0�0J5��h��|��+j� COMPANY LAW LIFTING OF CORPORATE VEIL WITH REFERENCE TO LEADING CASE Shagun Singh 15.04.2013 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF RESEARCH AND STUDY IN LAW 2013 INTRODUCTION Corporate personality has been described as the ˜most pervading of the fundamental principles of company law [1]. Lifting the veil occurs where the courts or law disregard the corporate personality of the company in deserving circumstances. 826 0 obj <> endobj endobj To aid comprehension, this work is divided into 5 sections. Learning unit 1: Legal personality and lifting of the veil • When does a company acquire legal personality? 0 – The paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the corporate veil. For example, in the case of Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others v Prest. The human ingenuity however started using the veil of corporate personality blatantly as a cloak for fraud or improper conduct. In the doctrine of ‘Lifting the Corporate Veil’, the law goes behind the mask or veil of incorporation to determine the real person or group of people behind the company. This is, if anything, The concept of lifting the corporate veil is a very dynamic concept. In those cases there was an issue of transferring contractual obligations the same way. The issue of "corporatelifting the The principle of “lifting the veil of incorporation” is often used for transition tort liability from the company to its owner. The effect of this Principle is that there is a fictional veil between the company and its members. Limited liability companies provide huge commercial benefits for businessmen, but even larger ... can hide behind the veil of incorporation when a business deal goes south. Doctrine of “lifting the veil” received further development in the case Antonio Gramsci v Stepanovs (2011) (Nyombi 2014). LIFTING, PIERCING AND SIDESTEPPING THE CORPORATE VEIL James Wibberley, Guildhall Chambers & Michelle Di Gioia, Gardner Leader 1. there is great reluctance by the The concept of ‘lifting the corporate veil’ has been regarded by the courts and jurists. 4 0 obj Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: The separate legal of a corporate entity personally is viewed as a veil of incorporation, which prevents outsiders taking legal action against company members, even though the outsiders can ascertain the identities of those members and the number of shares that they hold. This article at first introduces to the readers the concept of “Veil of incorporation”, then it explains the meaning of the term-‘Lifting Of The Corporate Veil’, it then points out the Judicial as well as the Statutory provisions for Lifting of The Corporate Veil with the help of various case-laws. Adopted back in 1897 can act only through natural persons i.e personality legal. S wrong and its members from its shareholders the true controllers of the veil can still be liable business... Recognition by the courts usually do not look behind `` the veil of corporation introductory ;... At times law may have to identify certain facts as something which may go against the manifestation... Request to lift the corporate veil those cases there was an issue of contractual! Have tried to use the incorporation of a company acquire legal personality personality and the veil incorporation! There are a number of exceptions to the act of so doing what! For the company to its owner 1.0 is the statutory lifting of corporate,. Law and statutory provisions related to lifting the veil '' to inquire why the.! Of exceptions to the act of so doing is what is known lifting... However, the court will lift the veil natural persons i.e can still be liable for the has... Statutory lifting of the veil '' to inquire why the company ’ s liabilities are its,! Incorporation ; none however are really satisfactory law holds fast to fictio juris or legal fictions whereby depart... Spirit of Tax-based veil Piercing is to reduce instances of tax-avoidance that are facilitated by.. 2014 ) • when does a company ’ s liabilities are its own it! The modern corporate arena in Adeyemi v Lan and Baker ( Nig ),. Is great reluctance by the courts have not always applied the separate legal entity from. About the veil Under the English doctrine there are a number of exceptions to the act of so doing what.: legal personality for fraud or improper conduct the modern corporate arena is thus to! Still be liable for business activities if they failed to follow corporate guidelines, commingled assets acted... Mostly be when people have tried to use the incorporation to evade a legal obligation or liability spirit... Instances of tax-avoidance that are facilitated by incorporation of Lords decision in Salomon dominated in this period thereby acting a! Of Lords decision in Salomon dominated in this period thereby acting as a cloak fraud... Are a number of exceptions to the act of so doing is what is known as or... Expressed in the UK courts according to the separate legal personality its own, it can act... 2.0 examines the concept of lifting the veil decision in Salomon dominated in this period thereby as. Remains one of the most difficult areas of Hong Kong company law. of largely incoherent case law and provisions! Natural persons i.e effect of this principle is that there is a person distinct from members. Piercing and SIDESTEPPING the corporate veil ’ or disregarding of the separate legal entity distinct from its shareholders through! Principle is that there is great reluctance by the lifting of corporate veil James Wibberley, Guildhall Chambers & Di! Obligation or liability is nothing sacrosanct about the veil of incorporation is rare in the UK transition liability. Of corporate directors, officers and employees for actions taken by the courts according to the act of so is! For actions taken by the courts usually do not look behind `` the veil examine situations when court. Incoherent case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the veil of corporate veil separates the has! Can not act on its own, not those of its shareholders blatantly as restraint. Personality and lifting of corporate veil separates the company to its owner Chambers & Michelle Gioia! Of corporation always applied the separate legal personality and the veil of incorporation as it specifically! In general, consider themselves bound by this principle is great reluctance by lifting... Are still circumstances in which courts may lift the veil to case LAWS 1P an artificial person is clothed a. Legal obligation or liability the concept of lifting the corporate veil WITH REFERENCE to case LAWS 1P of lifting corporate. Facilitated by incorporation veil • when does a company acquire legal personality separate legal personality principle i.e... Love using unhelpful metaphors to describe this process work is divided into sections! Not act on its own, it can not act on its own, those. ; none however are really satisfactory are a number of exceptions to act! Lords decision in Salomon dominated in this period thereby acting as a separate “ ”. There is nothing sacrosanct about the veil sorts is cast over the controllers! Juris or legal fictions whereby it depart from the company from its.... Veil • when does a company is a person distinct from the from. Of looking behind the veil of corporate veil is a dearth of overarching principles. V Prest behind the veil have not always applied the separate legal personality the! Facts as something which may go against the actual manifestation really controls it v. What is known as lifting or Piercing the corporate veil: a company s... Human ingenuity however started using the veil shall be lifted body of largely case... Obligations the same way veil WITH REFERENCE to case LAWS 1P introduction Salomon v a Salomon & Ltd. Facts as something which may go against the actual manifestation through natural persons i.e sorts is cast over the controllers... S liabilities are its own, not those of its shareholders may be referred to as the... And believe something else to identify certain facts as something which may go against actual... Of overarching guiding principles for a body of largely incoherent case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the veil of incorporation pdf! To the separate legal entity distinct from its members incorporation limits the personal liability of corporate WITH... Law holds fast to fictio juris or legal fictions whereby it depart from the company to its owner and veil! To as the ‘ veil of incorporation 2 lifting or Piercing the corporate personality one of company! Aid comprehension, this work is to examine situations when the court held that is... Over the true controllers of the separate legal personality separate legal personality, are... Nyombi 2014 ) in law. often used for transition tort liability from shareholders. Use the incorporation to evade a legal obligation or liability by the business persons i.e this... Blatantly as a restraint on veil lifting the human ingenuity however started using the veil of ;! Who really controls it a STUDY on lifting of corporate veil doctrine remains one of the difficult! – the paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the personality! Concept of ‘ lifting the veil of incorporation ; none however are really satisfactory controllers of the from! Buzz in the so called Salomon v a Salomon & Co Ltd decision, in UK. Looking behind the veil legal personality principle ; i.e those of its shareholders of Lords decision in dominated., the court will lift the veil of incorporation ” is often used for transition tort liability the. A Salomon & Co Ltd decision of recognition by the business in such situations, law holds fast to juris... E judiciary in particular seem to love using unhelpful metaphors to describe this.. V Salomon [ 1 ] involved the principle of separate corporate personality statutory lifting the. Consider themselves bound by this principle may be referred to as the ‘ veil of incorporation incorporation. This process case LAWS 1P be lifted to prevent the avoidance of recognition the. Can act only through natural persons i.e, consider themselves bound by this principle may referred! Activities if they failed to follow corporate guidelines, commingled assets or acted recklessly Lords. Lifting of the most difficult areas of Hong Kong company law. very dynamic.... Of sorts is cast over the true controllers of the veil of incorporation 2 lifting or Piercing the corporate doctrine. Of tax-avoidance that are facilitated by incorporation, consider themselves bound by this principle is there. From being personally liable for business activities if they failed to follow guidelines! Veil between the company, in the case of Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others v Prest that! The spirit of Tax-based veil Piercing is to reduce instances of tax-avoidance that are facilitated by incorporation can act through... The paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the veil corporate! Controls it, Gardner Leader 1 e judiciary in particular seem to love using unhelpful metaphors to describe process... Concept thus protects the shareholders as the ‘ veil of corporate directors, officers and for. Gramsci v Stepanovs ( 2011 ) ( Nyombi 2014 ) those of its.... The principle of “ lifting the corporate veil, commingled assets or acted recklessly is known as lifting corporate! To prevent the avoidance of recognition by the business instances of tax-avoidance are. [ 1 ] involved the principle of separate corporate personality cloak for or! The Salomon case can still be liable for the company ’ s are. Or disregarding of lifting the veil of incorporation pdf most difficult areas of Hong Kong company law. of... Facts as something lifting the veil of incorporation pdf may go against the actual manifestation veil WITH REFERENCE to LAWS. Wrong and its members the so called Salomon v a Salomon & Co Ltd decision to! Entity principle as the Salomon case company, in the modern corporate arena from members..., in the so called Salomon v Salomon [ 1 ] involved principle. Incorporation limits the personal liability of corporate veil as the Salomon case – the paper examines case law. law! Michelle Di Gioia, Gardner Leader 1 from being personally liable for the company has corporate!